Chris X Edwards

Here's an idea: Have students'in-person attendance inversely proportional to their grades. Too obvious? My GPA would have been a lot higher!
2020-08-04 14:37
Wouldn't it be great if there were some confusion if e-stuff actually meant "edible"? E-mail. E-book. E-wallet. E-learning. E-commerce. Etc.
2020-08-03 08:21
Guess I've done more toxic sanding projects than the CDC. That's why I note a lot of masks with exhale bypass vents which don't block C19.
2020-07-28 09:40
Have to agree with John Oliver who says, "The beach doesn't cure anything, except you being comfortable."
2020-07-27 18:09
The Talking Heads' Nothing But Flowers is strangely much less satirical than it used to be. Surrealism may not be up to the task today.
2020-07-27 15:13
Blah Blah

The Good News, The Bad News, And The Ugly News

2020-08-08 15:50

The bad news is obvious, right? It’s everywhere. Plague! House arrest for everybody! Great Depression or Greatest Depression Ever?! Riots! A president who once savagely beat a puppy to death with a golf club. (Actually, I just made that last one up — but what is worse, that false "fact" or a president who doesn’t mind citing such flagrantly false facts? Feel free to make up your own "facts" about the president — he doesn’t care!)

Enough has been said about the bad news. I want to focus on the good news. Before that can make sense, however, we need to consider the ugly news — the news that makes no sense and is a muddled mess. Unfortunately, that has been literally all news about the details of this pandemic.

It starts with this.

The current coronavirus disease, Covid-19, has been called a once-in-a-century pandemic. But it may also be a once-in-a-century evidence fiasco.

At a time when everyone needs better information, from disease modelers and governments to people quarantined or just social distancing, we lack reliable evidence on how many people have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 or who continue to become infected. Better information is needed to guide decisions and actions of monumental significance and to monitor their impact.

That was back in March. Plenty of time for everybody to start to figure out what sensible data looks like. And yet, it never came! Every day there would be some fatuous headlines like these:

The Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center interactive map is a complete joke, gormlessly hinting that Germany is twice as dangerous as Indonesia.


Another grand example of terrible data is the CDC. Check out their CDC COVID Data Tracker.


The default that comes up is "Total Cases". What is so stupid about this? Imagine a prolific creator of false facts using this "data" to "manage" the pandemic. First of all one can have fewer "total cases" by simply nerfing testing. But a really accomplished false fact artiste would say something like, "COVID-19 cures most natural causes of death! Just look at how the population is thriving under the therapeutic influence of this wonderful virus. Which was my idea by the way." Go on, look at that "data" in the CDC chart and tell me how that claim can be refuted. It can’t.

That’s the ugly news. I feel like I have been watching an endless game of Numberwang.

But I have seen a glimmer of hope! Let’s turn now to the good news.

Back in March, some rando on the internet — who also happens to be a faculty member of the University of Cambridge’s Risk and Evidence Communications unit — wrote a sensible article about How much normal risk does Covid represent? The answer, summarized, was that your risk of dying pretty much doubled.

The way I would explain that is to imagine playing Russian roulette with a six-shooter that had two bullets instead of one. If your gun had 800 chambers (equivalent odds for a normal person in their 30s), going from 1 bullet to 2 wouldn’t be quite so problematic. Note that everybody’s gun gets smaller as they age.

My real point there was that article way back in March was the last example of good data considered sensibly that I have seen during this entire mess — until today.

I feel too financially insecure to afford The Economist, but I do get their email newsletter and sometimes their content is not paywalled. Today they tipped me off to this unusually clear and cogent resource.

Stare at this and soak it in and you’ll understand what is wrong with all other sources.

The first thing to notice is they’ve cut through the bullshit of bullshit testing. The last time I saw such a muddled testing situation was either standardized academic testing or maybe even IQ. Testing sensibly for Covid pathologies and dangers is even worse than normal CYA medical diagnostics. This data from The Economist understands that and moves on to what can be sensibly inferred about the situation.

If we stop and ask ourselves what we care about, number one on the list is not getting killed. So The Economist asks the simple question, are we getting killed more than normal? Don’t worry about why. It could be people dying of asbestosis because masks are hard to acquire for construction work. Doesn’t matter. Step one is to answer the question - is there a problem? And The Economist’s methodology is so simple that it’s actually plausible. They simply look at how many people used to die and how many people are dying now and see how/if that has changed.

That’s so simple, but really it is a relief to me that someone is looking at this in a way that is not deeply flawed to the point of being meaningless. They even have a nice Github repo with all their data and scripts if you’d like to quibble with their methodological details. (For example, I would make minor adjustments based on natural changes of population, but really, not strictly necessary to appreciate these numbers as better than anything we’ve seen thus far.)

It is "good" news in the sense that it is of good quality. It is also good in the sense that it looks pretty good. I am not terrified by this data.

At first I misunderstood the "Absolute" setting on the graphs to mean they were like the fatuous CDC data. But really this data is much more useful. It is not showing absolute deaths - which no one really cares about. It is highlighting the validity of testing statistics. The difference in Covid-19 attributed deaths and real deaths is directly measuring the effectiveness of the testing programs. They are frankly not as abysmal as I thought — though I live in NY where, like NJ, Spain, Holland, Italy, and non-WEIRD nations, it is pretty abysmal.

It’s interesting to note the negative rates after the spike. The article cautions that some of this more recent data may just reflect reporting lag. My intuition is that many victims were probably close to death anyway and there were less people to die in June if they had their exit schedule moved up to May.


Reports of a "second wave" seem pretty overblown. Again, could be reporting lag, but this data isn’t terrifying me. It’s looking like people got sick, like they do when something is going around. All the vulnerable and unlucky people got it, and it doesn’t really have much more room to cause trouble. That could be a very wrong guess, but this data, real actual data that is not meaningless, is in no way contradicting that assessment.

I’m actually pretty impressed that a lot of states really are not seeing anything like what New York and New Jersey saw. Look at Wisconsin or Idaho or Missouri.


I would actually say that the danger for them is greater. It’s greater because to my thinking they have not had the full force of the pandemic come and hit their vulnerable populations yet.

One could make the case that this shows that protective measures, lockdowns, and hygiene theater are working. I’m not sure if there is enough data for that by, say, comparing Sweden with Switzerland. But this kind of data could tell us exactly what works. It’s not testing as I had previously imagined. Testing is almost as elusive as a vaccine; let’s just rule sensible tests out and focus on real and obvious effects.

What really works is simply tracking deaths promptly and accurately like any 21st century society should be doing anyway. With sensibly tracked deaths, accurate studies to gauge the efficacy of various measures are actually plausible, even using "natural" experiments with different sides of the state line doing different things. It would be really helpful to see these plots with the same plots superimposed from other flu seasons and outbreaks.

As one of the early adopters of Covid-19 I can tell you that if you get it, it’s no picnic. (I am feeling a bit better than last month, thanks.) But this data is not only good in the sense of not being stupid; it’s good because it doesn’t show an impending apocalypse. It’s exactly data like this that we need.

Virus Update And Cure Strategies

2020-07-13 11:40

Although bad haircuts are a widespread side effect of the current pandemic, it is not hard to recognize this guy even with a mask on.


That of course is a guy who is famous for three things (besides his hair). The third is being prime minister of the UK and the second is being a famous Brexit wanker. But his most famous fame is being one of the most notorious victims of COVID-19. Whatever your feelings about him, I think we can all agree that Boris Johnson was hospitalized in mid-April because of a severe case of COVID-19. So here’s what I want to know.

Why is he wearing a mask now?

Besides privacy/anonymity, masks can have two functional objectives. The first one, the normal and obvious one, is to keep bad stuff away from you, like when you’re sanding fiberglass. Interestingly, in pandemic times, this is not why masks are encouraged. For airborne disease control the idea of masks is a second objective, keeping the wearer from expelling and spreading infectious particles.

Are we worried that The Right Honourable Mr Johnson is a threat to our health? Are we worried that he will spread some infectious agent that will inflame the pandemic? Do we think that two months after suffering the most unambiguous case of COVID-19 possible that he is still an infectious threat?

Or, is Mr. Johnson looking to the first function of protective masks and trying to keep himself from getting infected again with C19? Either way, I would suggest that if this strategic thinking is valid, we are into some serious zombie apocalypse scenario.

Of course I bring this famous case up to highlight one of the most obscure cases of COVID-19 — mine. It turns out that I’m not too fond of wearing masks even when sanding fiberglass (though I do my best to do so). But having to wear a mask in the limited public outings I’ve had in the last 4 months has been especially tiresome. Why? Because it impedes breathing. Not a problem for a high volume athletic oxygen furnace like me, right? Not so much these days.

I’m still cycling about 100km a week but I can feel the damage. I had mentioned reduced circulation in my shins but that was really just the most noticeable problem. I’ve done a lot of work to strengthen my shins and they feel ok today but still not full strength. But as in December there has been a wave of problems targeting many different subsystems, just much more mild. Right now my thighs are covered in bruises, both left and right — I have no idea why. Last week I had unnatural leg muscle pain for no explainable reason. When I wake up in the morning my arms tingle with paresthesia (aka limbs "falling asleep"). I also have an ear infection, just like I did at the end of my illness previously, but other ear now; the second ear infection of my life. And my breathing is not at full strength. I can become winded just climbing the stairs. When riding I can feel the loss of capacity. I’ve been saying that it feels like I’m living at 2000m or 3000m, depending on the day — about the altitude of HAPE, a mountaineering sickness, which has some very similar symptoms to C19. It’s all pretty tiring.

Is this weakness half a year later scarring of some kind? Nerve damage? Vasculature damage? Immune system weakened? More live C19 virus attack? Reinfection? Hard to say.

My current guess about COVID-19, from personal experience, is most closely aligned with the thinking in this article which is well worth a read: Coronavirus May Be a Blood Vessel Disease, Which Explains Everything. I think that kind of idea is sinking in finally and I’m now seeing others pursue this possibility: It’s not just the lungs: The Covid-19 virus attacks like no other respiratory infection.

That’s my current situation — there are indeed long term effects. What can we do about it? Probably nothing for me personally, but for humans in general there are many different strategic approaches to defeating this disease. Let’s review my tiny opinions about each of them.

The first is a vaccine. To which I say good fucking luck. You can have no more than two of the following: developed soon; works; safe. This sensible article from a former CDC epidemiologist calls out all kinds of problems with the hope for a magic cure any time soon. It highlights a phenomenon known as antibody-dependent enhancement which

…causes some vaccine recipients, who nevertheless become infected by exposure to a pathogen, paradoxically to have more severe illness than if they had not been vaccinated at all. ADE has been observed for coronavirus vaccines in monkeys, pigs, cats, and in cultured human cells. It was also observed in children after a trial of a respiratory syncytial virus vaccine and after a mass campaign of a licensed dengue virus vaccine given to 830,000 children in the Philippines, resulting in withdrawal of the vaccine."

I just can’t help but think that the vaccine hope is a form of wishful thinking similar to "pharma is not predatory and these magic beans will magically cure my lifetime of poor lifestyle choices".

At this point C19 is a real pain in the ass, but so is HIV and ebola (actually now has a brand new vaccine after only 44 years!) and a lot of other diseases; why not come up with cures for them too? Because it is very hard to do and considerable luck is required.

What about "contact tracing"? Good idea, right? I side with Bruce Schneier who says correctly it is "just plain dumb". And he’s not even introducing any privacy concerns to the discussion. I like this barb at gormless Silicon Valley tech bros for their typical banality when solving any problem (Ans: a telephone app?). "To me, it’s just techies doing techie things because they don’t know what else to do." Australia’s experience is what I would expect: How did the Covidsafe app go from being vital to almost irrelevant?

What’s sad to me is that contact tracing is close to the right answer. This pandemic is not really a medical problem any more. It is an industrial engineering problem. Unfortunately the world’s industrial engineers are restrained in obscurity thanks to a terrible name for their profession. It has been extremely frustrating to see the terrible ad hoc industrial engineering popping up everywhere in response to The Virus. Suffering the virus itself was only slightly more demoralizing than the constant stream of fatuous reports featuring numbers of new cases lacking base rates! But a sensible application of some serious industrial engineering could cure this pandemic in a few weeks. Because very few people understand this, it will not happen. (I am delighted with the I.E. consolation prize — that this virus forced major grocery store chains to use single feeder lines. Yay! Should have done that decades ago!)

One problem that severely impacts the aforementioned industrial engineering cure is testing. Testing, if quick, accurate, and effective enough would itself essentially be a cure without fancy industrial engineering heroics. But it’s neither fast nor accurate, and thus not effective. People keep asking me, "Don’t you want to know if you have it?" Well, my symptoms were enough of a red flag positive test for me, but of course I’d love for some simplistic magic test to tell me something useful about this disease. But I have no faith in such things. I’ve seen all kinds of health security theater going on and these tests seem fraught with complexity. This resource is very expansive and hints at the diverse problems someone taking "testing" seriously will encounter. Tack onto that living in the medical third world and I’m not too keen to try my luck — you only need to read the title of this article to appreciate my misgivings: Two Friends in Texas Were Tested for Coronavirus. One Bill Was $199. The Other? $6,408.

Earlier some people were thinking that the warmer weather would tamp down the virus. That’s obviously not actually happening. People are out more, the dumb ones at political rallies even. Even if hot weather was helpful, it’s looking pretty strongly like air conditioning is not great for controlling the virus. When the AC industry lobby is worried about that we probably all should be.

How will this pandemic end? Consider the difference between these two scenarios: A. The disease is running amok and no one realizes there’s a problem. B. People are aware there is a virulent disease that is quite deadly to a certain demographic. It is possible that all the reduction we’re seeing is because we once had A and now we have B. I think that has been the single biggest factor in controlling things. My money is still on luck mysteriously causing this to simply go away for reasons that medical research will be too underfunded to understand. Like previous pandemics! At some point we will run out of susceptible potential victims.

One final interesting therapeutic approach is transfusions of antibody-rich blood plasma from COVID-19 survivors to inoculate against the disease. This article claims it is promising but mired in regulatory friction. I can’t say if that’s a sensible idea or not. But it does make me wonder… Who knows, maybe it might be smart for uninfected people to inhale deeply in the unmasked presence of strong antiviral producers like Boris Johnson. And me.

UPDATE 2020-07-19

In summary, progress since January 2020 has been impressive, but there is still so much more to learn. Are T cells protective and if so which are the key antigens and and cytokine effector programs to focus on? Are all T cell responses beneficial, or are some contributory to immunopathology and to be avoided? If it is indeed the case that antibodies are transient and T cell memory is more durable (though, how durable?), what can we learn about anomalies of T follicular helper-B cell interactions in germinal centers? In the short to medium term, we need to ensure that all of this T cell toolkit and knowledge is brought to bear on robust, comparative evaluation of the different vaccine platforms, their immunogenicity, efficacy and safety. Entering the next part of the battle, there are many thousands of people suffering the chronic aftermath of infection posed by chronic, so-called long-COVID cases, characterized by diverse symptoms including fatigue, joint pain and dyspnea. A more detailed understanding of the T cell immunology will be valuable in deciphering this pathogenesis.

At the start of the pandemic, a key mantra was that we needed the game-changer of antibody data to understand who had been infected and how many were protected. As we have learnt more about this challenging infection, it’s time to admit that we really need the T cell data too.

I’m citing this paper as a thoughtful excellent contribution to the topic. It is basically saying that simplistic thinking about the immune system is wrong. And I believe that sentiment is absolutely correct. But note the "and and" [sic] in the second sentence. My writing isn’t grammatical perfection but I’m not published in fancy scientific journals, i.e. peer reviewed and professionally edited. I don’t mean to carp but rather point out that we humans are fallible and even in the field of immunology, mistakes are made. Perhaps especially in that field? My point is that if we get a miracle cure it will indeed be a miracle.

UPDATE 2020-07-19

Some industrial engineering heroics finally shambling into action. It’s been very painful for me to watch this not happen for so long. Trump admin allows group Covid-19 testing.

UPDATE 2020-07-28

This short article asks, Can you get the coronavirus twice? They seem to conclude that it is possible but unlikely. They correctly make the logical conclusions echoing my concerns about the topic.

If [reinfection] can occur, that could undermine the idea of "immunity passports" for returning back to workplaces. And it would not bode well for hopes of getting a long-lasting vaccine.

Again, to summarize - either I have nothing to worry about personally or we’re all screwed.

UPDATE 2020-08-03

Still unclear about what an industrial engineering solution looks like? Here’s an example of the kind of thing that seems obvious to me but which has been clumsily avoided throughout this ordeal.

We construct network measures of nursing home connectedness and estimate that nursing homes have, on average, connections with 15 other facilities. Controlling for demographic and other factors, a home’s staff-network connections and its centrality within the greater network strongly predict COVID-19 cases.

UPDATE 2020-08-06

The ever excellent Ed Yong writes another superb piece.

This is about as gentle of an introduction to practical immunology as it gets and clearly addresses things I’ve been wondering about. In one sentence he hits upon the conundrum I’ve highlighted.

…concerns that people could be infected repeatedly, or even that a vaccine — many of which work by readying neutralizing antibodies — won’t provide long-term protection.

In other words, either people can’t get reinfected (well, easily anyway) or vaccines are not as useful as people imagine — one of the two, pick one. While that simple analysis is simple and not completely invalid, Yong does rightly spend the majority of the article correctly emphasizing that when it comes to immunology, it’s complicated.

Aftermath Of The Cytokine Storm

2020-06-05 07:11

Some precise number of days (which I know but will redact) before I turned 18, I know exactly where I was and what I was doing. That is because I could not quite legally gamble, yet I was in a casino in Las Vegas. On Christmas Day. I was doing a family thing for family connections that lived in Las Vegas. Visiting a casino on such a strange day is just something one can do if you don’t take traditional holidays too seriously and you happen to be in town coincidentally.

What single adjective would I use to describe the Las Vegas casinos on Christmas Day? Answer: Chinese. That was a while back, but I doubt things are too much different today. Think about it. Normal Christmas-celebrating Americans wouldn’t usually think to go to Vegas on such an incompatible major holiday. But it would be reasonable for normal Chinese people to happily take up the slack and cheap rates.

In 2019, exactly 8 days after flying and spending the day in airports (SAN, PHX, BUF — LAS on the way out!), I record my first written description of the illness that dominated my life this past winter. What day did I travel? November 28 - Thanksgiving Day. A day I chose because the rates (and I) were cheap — Americans do not like to travel the entirety of Thanksgiving Day. I have no idea if this is truly relevant, but it is certainly interesting to think about.

You know how my blog posts often maddeningly change topics a few paragraphs in? The change often looks like a radical departure, but I do actually try to keep a thematic strand connecting them. So here we go.

The Economist just posted a very interesting article called How SARS-CoV-2 Causes Disease And Death In Covid-19. The article says:

The immune response to a virus starts with infected cells producing a suite of signalling molecules called cytokines. Some of these tell other cells nearby to be on their guard against attack, thus stymying the virus’s ability to replicate itself. Others tell the immune system to come and put some stick about. Thus called to arms, the immune system launches both a prompt all-purpose response—inflammation—and a subsequent targeted counter-attack using antibodies and cells specifically programmed to attack both virus particles and the cells they have infected. Unfortunately SARS-CoV-2 seems able to interfere with the early steps of the immune response. It can apparently counteract the part that dampens replication in nearby cells. It may also enhance inflammation.

When inflammation gets completely out of control the body enters what is called a cytokine storm. Such storms drive the most severe outcomes for covid-19, including multi-organ failure.

Now take a look at this birthday greeting I wrote to a friend and former colleague who is a computational biophysics researcher and professor of pharmacology.


I’m still struggling to get to my next birthday, still under attack by some kind of pathogen. … I’ve never had an illness like this as an adult. My guess is that it is a flu virus but it could be bacterial. I feel like it went from my lungs to my major meat muscles. Each day I’d get a new thing. For example, one day my tibialis anterior was hit with what runners call "shin splints". I’m very familiar with muscle pain from muscle wear and tear but it’s unnerving when there is no sensible cause. I set up a bike inside and riding that helped my leg muscles a lot. I think the main infection is mostly defeated and controlling secondary infections is indeed the important thing. I lost a lot of weight so I’m trying to eat as much as possible. That’s not easy since I have very little appetite. I’m also wondering if maybe my body is doing some silly overreacting, something like a cytokine storm. Of course, as you know, at that level it all becomes overwhelmingly complex.


Reviewing these emails has helped me put together some other pieces of the puzzle. All spring long I’ve been cold. Especially my shins. I moved a down sleeping bag to my office to put on my shins thinking I was blocking a draft or something. I crawled around to see if a fan from a computer on the floor was blowing on my legs. I changed things around with my seating arrangements thinking maybe my circulation was being constrained by my chair making me cold (circulation problems are synonymous to me with being cold — and, yes, I am an expert). Then a few weeks ago the weather went from cool to insanely hot (90F/32C) overnight. My shins were still cold.

That was an "oh shit" moment for sure. My illness has really messed up my shins apparently. I am now aggressively rebuilding my shin muscles. Now that I’m focusing on them it’s clear, they’re not right at all. I’m a little nervous about other lasting damage. I’m sleeping about 30 minutes to an hour longer each day than I did at the same time last year (I always sleep the maximum amount my body will let me).

But I feel mostly ok. I have a near comically healthy lifestyle — if anyone is going to shake off problems that can be shaken off, it will be me. The excellent Ed Yong (whose book I reviewed) has a very interesting article in the Atlantic; it is the first I have seen which has been properly sympathetic to the brutal hardships of symptomatic survivors. The article is very scary because of this and strong hints of long term effects. You can see why I’m taking this all kind of seriously. And even though the infallible apolitical CDC has assured me — by fiat — that I did not suffer covid 19 because they did not notice the infection, I’m going to pay attention to covid 19 data and assume it is relevant for the functionally identical illness I did have.

Bright Side Of Life

2020-06-03 11:32

I’m proud that my cultural heritage can be helpful at this time. There might have been a translation error, however, because I’m not sure if the governor fully appreciates the sarcasm that is mixed in with the stoic nihilism here. Still, it put a smile on my face.


Life’s a piece of shit
When you look at it
Life’s a laugh and death’s a joke, it’s true
You’ll see it’s all a show
Keep em laughin as you go
Just remember the last laugh is on you

And always look on the bright side of life!

X Marks The Loot

2020-05-25 01:21

I recently had an idea for a new video game mechanic. In many game genres, there is a common trope where the protagonist goes out into the world and does exciting action things which often result in surplus equipment or other valuables. You might kill a dragon which has a valuable set of scales. Or you kill a few enemy soldiers. In both of those cases the normal way the situation is handled is by giving the player the chance to "loot" the scene. But how can it make any sense to head back into town with a half dozen sets of weapons and full suits of armor, or a complete dragon hide? Staggering back thus encumbered might be plausible if that’s all you needed to do, but there will be obstacles, other monsters and other things to discover. You know, the stuff that makes the game have a plot.

Currently there are a few strategies to deal with this. One is to severely limit what you can loot from the set of what one would reasonably expect. Was everyone you just fought wearing socks? Yes? Yet the game is not going to let you loot socks. It limits things to just the salient weapons or even just some random items drawn from a loot table.

The other main strategy — and they’re not mutually exclusive — is to just let the player carry an absurd amount of stuff. Related to that is discounting how much items weigh. A champion of those strategies would be the deliberately fanciful Minecraft where players can carry nearly 10 billion kg! (I actually disagree with that analysis because I don’t assume nondestructive crafting in Minecraft. And a player can carry only 36 hats before collapsing under their weight. But the point of the analysis is still quite correct and illustrative.)

But what if you’re going for a game with maximal immersion and fidelity. I can not recall ever seeing this problem addressed realistically. How might a game do better with this problem?

I imagine an open world game like Skyrim or Borderlands or Fallout or Witcher3 or or Red Dead Redemption or even GTA handling this problem in the following way. Once a player encounters a situation where collecting an absurd amount of stuff is possible, they have the option to shuttle it to a cache, basically a hiding place. They then make a note of that on their maps.

How this works is that back in the village among safe and helpful NPCs, the player can then choose to sell these notes to various salvage operators. These guys are not professional dragon slayers. They are just professional movers of stuff. If you tell them exactly where to go and what to find — with assurances that the local monsters are all dead! — they can then make the implausible portaging plausible. Why bother bringing all this stuff back to town to sell, when the shopkeeper you’re planning to sell things to could also be handling the moving? You’re this world’s messiah — outsource a bit!

Geralt Should Hire A Sherpa


Besides making games less unrealistic, what’s cool about this mechanic is that it can have a lot of tunable elements which could be interesting for the player. For example, let’s say you come to town and tell a salvager that you have buried a chest of gold that you want to sell and reveal the general area it’s in. All of this can be done by selecting from a menu that is essentially your notes. At this point the salvager has to decide if he trusts you enough to go attempt to get your stuff. You could have a system where you build trust slowly. Maybe at first you can only hire shady itinerant movers who commonly set out after your gold and then disappear forever, maybe stealing your treasure or maybe failing and its still there waiting. Or maybe the earnest recovery effort is robbed by bandits or their ship is dashed on the rocks in a storm. These kinds of problems set up new missions where you, the hero, can go salvage the salvage operation or hunt down perfidious cheaters.

As you do more business, you might be able to pay, up front, someone in a permanent location to go fetch your stuff. They have a good reputation and will likely work to keep it. Eventually you are trustworthy enough that these professional salvagers will simply pay you coin for your notes and the transaction is complete — you have gold in your pocket from some lootable adventure without the clumsy impossible process of hauling that loot.

Khajiit Trader Says: Necessary Assets Ready To Go


You could imagine that different towns would have different reputations. You could trick some of these merchants if they aggravate you or you don’t mind burning your reputation there. They may charge more commission if the trip is long or requires visiting dangerous places. There can be a whole complex dynamic to work out optimal routes for multiple pickups, a famously tricky travelling salesman problem. They might even tell you that they could loot the cave in the elven ruins if it weren’t for the trolls that lived nearby — prompting you to go kill three stone trolls and add their loot to the shipping manifest. This would make it plausible to capture entire ships or wagons or cars and leave them for others to sensibly pick up and liquidate.

There might be interesting dynamics in how long it takes to get paid or take possession of the item back in town, maybe timed for correct leveling. You could have a system that allows players to basically act as scouts for some things; for example, they might come back and sell to a craftsman the general location of a crafting ingredient (e.g. mine’s ore vein or rare plant grove or animal sighting, etc). Or even "loot" entire buildings or towns by delivering to the right people the information that it is now safe to occupy.

You could hire trustworthy movers to go to your remote base and retrieve needed items from storage for some particular mission. A lighter version of this would be where the player has to haul all of the loot to major hubs which functionally act as railheads.

Maybe have different levels of caching. A poorly stashed hoard may be found by someone else by the time your mover arrives sparking all kinds of interesting tension. Maybe if this is a common problem the player can improve their odds by dividing the loot and performing multiple hiding operations. Maybe there could be a dynamic where poor hiding results in the mover not being able to find the loot; the loot is still there, but the mover is too annoyed to try again. Or maybe that problem doesn’t result from poor hiding but rather careful hiding!

By having a system like this, players can obsessively loot a place and yet the carrying weight limit can still be set at something sane. It opens the door for all kinds of intrigue. You can duly approve and appreciate all the junk items you’re taking from the battlefield sets without having them clutter your real working inventory. And if you come across an item that’s a keeper, but you can’t take it now, it can be handled later — by someone else!

Some may object that this makes the game too complicated, like running a logistics business. But I’m afraid that fast travel wagon has already rolled out of the city gates. Have a look at this hilarious scene CD Project Red scripted into Witcher3 to troll people who run mods to give themselves unaccountable wealth.

Clearly players can enjoy such bookkeeping details!


For older posts and RSS feed see the blog archives.
Chris X Edwards © 1999-2020